RE: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
31 Jan
2002
31 Jan
'02
10:53 p.m.
On 02:18 PM 1/31/2002 -0500, Daniel Senie wrote:
At 01:59 PM 1/31/02, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Pendergrass wrote:
It doesn't make sense that an ISP should complain that customers use 100% of what they pay for.
So you think that dialup users should be allowed to stay online 24/7 for $20/month on an account advertised as unlimited?
If not, then the use of the word "unlimited" is more than a bit misleading, no? Be careful what you market, as people (and the FTC) will be happy to hold you to your word.
So I take it that I get "unlimited" email storage disk space too? And I can send or receive emails of any size? No? Hmmm. I better get the FTC involved. jc jc
8361
Age (days ago)
8361
Last active (days ago)
0 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
JC Dill