Re: Rate of growth on IPv6 not fast enough?
--- jimb@jsbc.cc wrote: From: Jim Burwell <jimb@jsbc.cc> I think this is different. They're talking about using a new IPv6 for each connection. RFC4941 just changes it over time IIRC. IMHO that's still pretty good privacy, at least on par with a NATed IPv4 from the outside perspective, especially if you rotated through temporary IPv6s fairly frequently. Of course, for browsers, as someone else mentioned, it's somewhat moot because of cookies. -------------------------------------------- Manage your cookies. preferences => privacy & security => cookies => select "ask for each cookie" Noisy in the beginning and then settles down after a while. Surprising, though, in what is tracked, so it's worth doing for a while just to observe. Oh, yeah, also manage your Flash cookies: http://macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_man... scott
participants (1)
-
Scott Weeks