---------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2 I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working. [root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer www.newnog.org. -------------------------------------------------- Now your only question is check or pay pal... :-) scott
Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record. It requires an AAAA record: baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t AAAA www.newnog.org 2011/02/07 13:51:23 www.newnog.org has no AAAA record And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its IPv6 address, which does appear to already be the case. So, when I'm informed that the AAAA record is up, I'll retest. Owen On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2 I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working.
[root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer www.newnog.org. --------------------------------------------------
Now your only question is check or pay pal... :-)
scott
[Reply-To: set to -futures@, as I don't think this is an operational issue.] On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
It requires an AAAA record:
In the e-mail to which you are replying (and top-posting, no less :), Mike said: "I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working." While I agree doing v6 is nice and all, I think brow-beating an un-paid volunteer on something they already said they were trying to get working is a bit much. Remember, this is a community effort. The people running the web & name servers are donating their time & their companies' resources to the community. If you believe they are doing it wrong, please step up and help. Input is great, encouraged even. Help is better. Complaining about NewNOG (soon to be NANOG) is complaining about -yourself-. If you are reading this message, you ARE NewNOG. -- TTFN, patrick
baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t AAAA www.newnog.org 2011/02/07 13:51:23 www.newnog.org has no AAAA record
And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its IPv6 address, which does appear to already be the case.
So, when I'm informed that the AAAA record is up, I'll retest.
Owen
On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2 I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working.
[root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer www.newnog.org. --------------------------------------------------
Now your only question is check or pay pal... :-)
scott
We all know that many people have no IPv6 connectivity. But I've only heard about future Internet-users without IPv4 connectivity... I didn't realize it was reality for Owen today. (Even my IPv6 phone via T-Mobile has NAT64 connectivity to www.newnog.org.) Cheers, -Benson On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:10 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
[Reply-To: set to -futures@, as I don't think this is an operational issue.]
On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
It requires an AAAA record:
In the e-mail to which you are replying (and top-posting, no less :), Mike said: "I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working." While I agree doing v6 is nice and all, I think brow-beating an un-paid volunteer on something they already said they were trying to get working is a bit much.
Remember, this is a community effort. The people running the web & name servers are donating their time & their companies' resources to the community. If you believe they are doing it wrong, please step up and help. Input is great, encouraged even. Help is better.
Complaining about NewNOG (soon to be NANOG) is complaining about -yourself-. If you are reading this message, you ARE NewNOG.
-- TTFN, patrick
baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t AAAA www.newnog.org 2011/02/07 13:51:23 www.newnog.org has no AAAA record
And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its IPv6 address, which does appear to already be the case.
So, when I'm informed that the AAAA record is up, I'll retest.
Owen
On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2 I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working.
[root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer www.newnog.org. --------------------------------------------------
Now your only question is check or pay pal... :-)
scott
Apologies to Mike, It was not my intention to brow-beat him publicly. Indeed, I acknowledge that he has the problem well in hand and is actively working on resolving the issue. My only intent was to point out to the person who claimed an ip6.arpa record and a host which had an IPv6 address on its interface alone were not a web site accessible on IPv6. I fully expect the AAAA record to be placed soon and it looks like that is the last remaining hurdle. Once that is done, I will pay my dues. Owen On Feb 7, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
[Reply-To: set to -futures@, as I don't think this is an operational issue.]
On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
It requires an AAAA record:
In the e-mail to which you are replying (and top-posting, no less :), Mike said: "I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working." While I agree doing v6 is nice and all, I think brow-beating an un-paid volunteer on something they already said they were trying to get working is a bit much.
Remember, this is a community effort. The people running the web & name servers are donating their time & their companies' resources to the community. If you believe they are doing it wrong, please step up and help. Input is great, encouraged even. Help is better.
Complaining about NewNOG (soon to be NANOG) is complaining about -yourself-. If you are reading this message, you ARE NewNOG.
-- TTFN, patrick
baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t AAAA www.newnog.org 2011/02/07 13:51:23 www.newnog.org has no AAAA record
And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its IPv6 address, which does appear to already be the case.
So, when I'm informed that the AAAA record is up, I'll retest.
Owen
On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---------------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Yes it does. 2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2 I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working.
[root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa domain name pointer www.newnog.org. --------------------------------------------------
Now your only question is check or pay pal... :-)
scott
Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> writes:
I fully expect the AAAA record to be placed soon and it looks like that is the last remaining hurdle. Once that is done, I will pay my dues.
There have been AAAA records in the zone for ages. I don't have a problem with you calling out our oversight on a public mailing list, but failure to CC the email address in the SOA's RNAME loses you a bit of best-practices high ground, don't you think? rs@bifrost [13] % rcsdiff -c -r1.4 -r1.5 newnog.org.db =================================================================== RCS file: RCS/newnog.org.db,v retrieving revision 1.4 retrieving revision 1.5 diff -c -r1.4 -r1.5 *** newnog.org.db 2010/05/24 22:46:54 1.4 --- newnog.org.db 2010/06/22 09:57:02 1.5 *************** *** 1,4 **** ! ; $Id: newnog.org.db,v 1.4 2010/05/24 22:46:54 rs Exp $ $ORIGIN newnog.org. --- 1,4 ---- ! ; $Id: newnog.org.db,v 1.5 2010/06/22 09:57:02 rs Exp $ $ORIGIN newnog.org. *************** *** 21,26 **** --- 21,29 ---- calendar IN CNAME ghs.google.com. sites IN CNAME ghs.google.com. + mailman IN A 216.211.130.244 + IN AAAA 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2 + _xmpp-server._tcp IN SRV 5 0 5269 xmpp-server.l.google.com. _xmpp-server._tcp IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server1.l.google.com. _xmpp-server._tcp IN SRV 20 0 5269 xmpp-server2.l.google.com. rs@bifrost [14] % I trust you are on top of sorting out Teh Paypal? Volunteering to help out with NANOG's educational outreach? Don't bother with cake; I can't eat it. -r PS: RCS is kicking it old-school, I know.
participants (5)
-
Benson Schliesser -
Owen DeLong -
Patrick W. Gilmore -
Robert E. Seastrom -
Scott Weeks