and those who are interested in exploring the future of ipv6 and contributing to my next article are welcomed. including my detractors on this list. contact me privately. susans getting a little dictatorial but i'll respect her position if everyone gets spanked. i can support the technical position of my article - but my detractors keep alluding to fiction and never have pointed out what is wrong with the statements made. Cheers Joe Baptista -- Planet Communications & Computing Facility a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:06:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Joe Baptista <baptista@dot-god.com> To: Susan Harris <srh@merit.edu> Cc: nanog-support@merit.edu, Publisher - CircleID Network <ali@circleid.com> Subject: Re: i think terroists are going to love ipv6 this isn't a political discussion this is fact. but i will cease with the warnings. those who are interested can semd me provate email. i'm pulling together a team to examine these issues. however i do agree with you that politics will impose itself on ipv6 technology. and isp's will be forced to participate in the fight against any form of political lobby against some authority or monied interests. but certainly my concerns with respect ti the spam is critical to this list. at least i see alot of that. now i hope your also sending this warning out to the people who are calling the article nonsens. i expect network administrators top point out where i have been mislead. it is after all leading members of the industry who i have interviewed. vint cerf is no small bananas and the advice provided in the article certainly is relevant to network engineering and operational issues. so i expect you to provide me with some written assurances that those hoi paloy hecklers have been appropriately bitch slapped by you. whats good for the goose is good for the gander so the saying goes. so relax - take a valium - be happy. we both know the isociety tries to quite the truth and i suspect your a leading member here if you don't warn those others. i expect you to do the right thing. love and kisses XOXOXOXOX joe baptista On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Susan Harris wrote:

Mr. Baptista - The NANOG list focuses on discussion of backbone network engineering and network operational issues. Please keep political commentary in private email. Refer to the NANOG list AUP:

http://www.nanog.org/aup.html

I contacted you two years ago about another AUP violation on your part. If you continue to violate the AUP, we'll need to remove your posting privileges from the list.

Susan Harris, Ph.D. Merit Network/Univ. of Mich.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Joe Baptista wrote:

...

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:

...

Not commenting on some of the fantasies in the article....

you should point out any fantasies you find in the article. i can support my findings with facts. fiction is a best a condition dictated by bureacrats, and on the internet that end up a comedy of errors. ipv6 is an end control system at this time in an ipv6 cloud where the ends are under complete end user control. i love ipv6. am looking forward to playing with it.

...

From what I remember China is pretty is active in IPv6 and from the APNIC presentations they also have a allocation. Not sure how come to the conclusions you do....

who cares. China is not aware of the security implications to the homeland. china is after all a nation ruled by madarines. the colours of authority change with the wind but the rules of the mandarine class has not ended. order is critical to the natural balance of chiness society.

ipv6 challenges order. so what will the nat wall of china do now. i shall of course be investigating. i think icann goes to china next ;)

cheers joe

...

- kurtis -

On onsdag, sep 25, 2002, at 11:55 Europe/Stockholm, Joe Baptista wrote:

...

http://www.circleid.com/articles/2539.asp

and i expect so will freedom fighters in china et. al. Maybe the subject of a future interview. and the biggest question of all, will china block the ipv6 protocol for homeland security reasons?

i look forward to some answers.

Cheers Joe Baptista

-- Planet Communications & Computing Facility a division of The dot.GOD Registry, Limited