AS7007 incident - would someone please "fix" the article?
There's a wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS_7007_incident .. that a post I wrote up for a local computer club magazine somehow suffices as primary reference material for. Even though I think this is partially hilarious, would someone mind making it a little more authoritive and well-referenced? My article was definitely not written to be used as any form of source, primary or otherwise. :-) Thanks! Adrian
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:08 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian@creative.net.au> wrote:
There's a wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AS_7007_incident
.. that a post I wrote up for a local computer club magazine somehow suffices as primary reference material for.
Even though I think this is partially hilarious, would someone mind making it a little more authoritive and well-referenced? My article was definitely not written to be used as any form of source, primary or otherwise. :-)
Thanks!
Adrian
Improving it wouldn't hurt, but though your note is the only listed "reference" it also includes external links to the cnet news article about it, two NANOG list messages, "Origin Authentication in Interdomain Routing" by Aiello, Ioannis, and McDaniel, and a Penn State routing seminar slide deck. It's not badly sourced all things considered; the other sources could be more prominently referred to, though. -- -george william herbert george.herbert@gmail.com
participants (2)
-
Adrian Chadd
-
George Herbert