Christ, Don't you people have anything better to do than to piss and moan about Karl on NANOG? This is NOT an issue that relates to NANOG. Take it to i.dont.give.a.damn.usenet.admin.anarchy and give it a rest here! At 10:13 PM 11/13/98 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 1998 at 09:42:41PM -0600, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:
Anyone who cancels someone elses post who is not a moderator or the original poster should lose their account/job at ISP/etc.
So lets start sending in complaints...
And you'd complain to...who? Karl's an independant entity now.
Correct :-)
What's even more fun is that since the system doesn't EMIT any articles it consumes (it emits only cancels, sourced there) you can't figure out where it gets its feeds from.... good luck getting the system's feeds cut off under those circumstances :-)
-- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
------- John Fraizer | __ _ The System Administrator | / / (_)__ __ ____ __ | The choice mailto:John.Fraizer@EnterZone.Net | / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | of a GNU http://www.EnterZone.Net/ | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...
I think there needs to be a different approach here. First and foremost the Usenet groups have been violated by crossposters who have run the gauntlet of fraud, sex and other hocus pocus. What would really be nice is the return of the traditional subject matter that each group were approved under. Restoring the tradition of Usenet and how it was basically used is the best solution and it will take a disciplined effort on all parts, is it realistic to ask this, I can't answer that question because I simply do not know. But anger and ego trips and power trips bring forth resistance and defeat the very purpose of good intent. Henry R. Linneweh John Fraizer wrote:
Christ,
Don't you people have anything better to do than to piss and moan about Karl on NANOG? This is NOT an issue that relates to NANOG. Take it to i.dont.give.a.damn.usenet.admin.anarchy and give it a rest here!
At 10:13 PM 11/13/98 -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 1998 at 09:42:41PM -0600, Edward S. Marshall wrote:
On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Dean Anderson wrote:
Anyone who cancels someone elses post who is not a moderator or the original poster should lose their account/job at ISP/etc.
So lets start sending in complaints...
And you'd complain to...who? Karl's an independant entity now.
Correct :-)
What's even more fun is that since the system doesn't EMIT any articles it consumes (it emits only cancels, sourced there) you can't figure out where it gets its feeds from.... good luck getting the system's feeds cut off under those circumstances :-)
-- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) http://www.mcs.net/~karl I ain't even *authorized* to speak for anyone other than myself, so give up now on trying to associate my words with any particular organization.
------- John Fraizer | __ _ The System Administrator | / / (_)__ __ ____ __ | The choice mailto:John.Fraizer@EnterZone.Net | / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / | of a GNU http://www.EnterZone.Net/ | /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ | Generation A 486 is a terrible thing to waste...
-- ¢4i1å
participants (2)
-
Henry Linneweh -
John Fraizer