Hank, Thanks. I've seen that article, but it did not furnish me with any "experiences" with these technologies. I appreciate the reference. Anybody have hands-on with these approaches and the relative strengths or weaknesses? Thanks, Marc

From hank@max.ibm.net.il Wed Nov 12 23:13:40 1997 Received: from max.ibm.net.il (root@max.ibm.net.il [192.115.72.170]) by biff.ibm.net.il (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id JAA20008; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 09:13:20 +0200 Received: from max.ibm.net.il (hank@max.ibm.net.il [192.115.72.170]) by max.ibm.net.il (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id JAA92056; Thu, 13 Nov 1997 09:13:18 +0200 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 09:13:18 +0200 (IST) From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il> To: Marcel Schoenbeck <pbalum@hotmail.com> cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: your mail In-Reply-To: <19971112205706.6946.qmail@hotmail.com> Message-ID: <Pine.A41.3.96-heb-2.07.971113091145.76182A-100000@max.ibm.net.il> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

On Wed, 12 Nov 1997, Marcel Schoenbeck wrote:

Pretty comprehensive comparison done on 10/97 by Data Communications on these and other companies. See: http://www.data.com/roundups/class_system.html

-Hank

...

hello Nanog,

A While back there was a thread on QoS, CoS...

I'm interested what people think about this category of products. There appear to be a bunch of vendors after this this market...

Cisco Ipsilon Checkpoint Packeteer Xedia Structured Internetworks

Has anybody worked with any of these products? Do they work? What about the different technologies

WFQ CBQ Flow Control not to mention RSVP

Is one approach better than another.

I'd love to hear any comments or experiences

~ Marc

______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com