In message <20000626172646.A1166@eiv.com>, Shawn McMahon writes:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2000 at 01:39:49PM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
so, thanks to many nanogians, i now have a selection of servers, multi- addressed servers, an ldap server, ... i can try when i need this service. needless to say, i am not impressed. while i guess i can limp along like this, it does not feel like what i would call a production quality service.
Randy, no offense, but it sounds like you have some seriously unrealistic expectations here.
Exactly how much are you paying for this service? It sounds like you should receive a full refund.
No, Randy has a need -- an operational need that I suspect many on this list share. His note simply says that the current system is inadequate for production use; a more recent note asks, in about these words, "what can he (and other operators) do" to help the situation. --Steve Bellovin
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
No, Randy has a need -- an operational need that I suspect many on this list share. His note simply says that the current system is inadequate for production use; a more recent note asks, in about these words, "what can he (and other operators) do" to help the situation.
what I have done in the past is refer people to my RIPE PGPKEY object, which possibly adds to (rather than aids) the fragmentation situation ... and may not be available to those without a trusted mntner. -[ Joshua Goodall ]----------------------------------------------- -[ IP Systems Developer ]---------------- Cook, Geek, Lover ------ -[ joshuag@interxion.com ]--------------- joshua@roughtrade.net --
participants (2)
-
Joshua Goodall -
Steven M. Bellovin