Alex Bligh writes: | This misses the point, it's not about what you /can/ afford | locally, it's how it's paid for. The problem is that the cost | implications are suffered disproportionately by those not | enjoying substantial benefit of having the route accepted. | You yourself have argued that $$ would fix this. You're right. I should simply go into randy-mode and repeat a mantra: - -- for future reference ---

[someone says that long prefixes are good/not-a-problem/...]

shut up and send me a cheque. - -- Sean.