Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
You're trying to achieve a perfect policy that will work for all time when what we need is something to eke out IPv4 for the rest of its natural life. By the time enough of your postulated ISPs have grown big enough AND THEN shrunk enough for this to matter in any practical sense, IPv4 will have become mostly static, and all of us here will have retired from active Internet Politics. I hope. On Jan 26, 12:59pm, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: } Subject: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations } } > Ronald Khoo <ronald@office.demon.net> writes: } } > Here's a suggestion for one simple rule. "Where delegating address space } > to a provider registry, a) never delegate a block smaller than any } > existing PA block already delegated, and b) once 3 such blocks are } > delegated, always delegate a block at least 4 times bigger". } } While sounding fine in general, this assumes ever increasing growth } of ISPs. An assumption easily proven invalid by counterexample. } } Daniel }-- End of excerpt from Daniel Karrenberg -- Ronald Khoo <ronald@demon.net> +44-181-371-1000 FAX +44-181-371-3750
Ronald Khoo <ronald@office.demon.net> writes: You're trying to achieve a perfect policy that will work for all time when what we need is something to eke out IPv4 for the rest of its natural life.
I am not trying to achieve a perfect policy. I am an engineer both by training and preference, not a policymaker. What I am trying to do is to discuss proposals for policies which look simple but break badly on already existing cases.
By the time enough of your postulated ISPs have grown big enough AND THEN shrunk enough for this to matter in any practical sense, IPv4 will have become mostly static, and all of us here will have retired from active Internet Politics. I hope.
We are talking about real ISPs. If you check the address space usage history of European local IRs, you will see that the growth in address space usage of some has flattened a lot (I was not talking about shrinking yet). Look in the area of national academic research networks. Your simplistic scheme, if cast in stone, would do the very wrong things for those. Try again Daniel
participants (2)
-
Daniel Karrenberg
-
Ronald Khoo