What about cflowd? At 11:23 AM 8/11/97 -0700, Justin W. Newton wrote:
Hi, Does anyone have any /recent/ information on the breakdown of packet sizes crossing the net right now? I have seen some of the older data, but am interested in whether or not the percentages are changing over time, and if so, how. I.e. I could see people moving from interactive services such as telnet for reading mail and news to going to a client based system would up the packet sizes. Likewise, the use of some of the streaming video and audio applications out there might lower it again. In my mind, recent is anything that has been done in the last 6 months or so.
************************************************************** Justin W. Newton voice: +1-415-482-2840 Senior Network Architect fax: +1-415-482-2844 PRIORI NETWORKS, INC. http://www.priori.net Legislative and Policy Director, ISP/C http://www.ispc.org "The People You Know. The People You Trust." **************************************************************
Paul G. Donner wrote:
What about cflowd?
cflowd would be really useful if netflow worked properly, which at least in 11.2(7), it doesn't. The official Cisco response is:
Case :H82607
There are many issues with netflow switch with 11.2(7) that are still being addressed. Currently the estimated release for a fix is 11.3. Please bare with us while this issues are been addressed.
Also, 11.2(7) only supports version 1 export packets, which cflowd doesn't understand without a small bit of work. Are people generally having any more luck with the 11.1CA images? It would be really nice to get some decent traffic stats. Nick
Also, 11.2(7) only supports version 1 export packets, which cflowd doesn't understand without a small bit of work.
Are people generally having any more luck with the 11.1CA images? It would be really nice to get some decent traffic stats.
You definitely need to run 11.1()CA images. 11.1 mainline is effectively dead. --jhawk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a few clients using 11.1.11CA (and later) doing Netflow v5 and they really like what it is doing for them. GK At 10:07 AM 8/12/97 +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Paul G. Donner wrote:
What about cflowd?
cflowd would be really useful if netflow worked properly, which
at least
in 11.2(7), it doesn't. The official Cisco response is:
Case :H82607
There are many issues with netflow switch with 11.2(7) that are still being addressed. Currently the estimated release for a fix is 11.3. Please bare with us while this issues are been addressed.
Also, 11.2(7) only supports version 1 export packets, which cflowd doesn't understand without a small bit of work.
Are people generally having any more luck with the 11.1CA images? It would be really nice to get some decent traffic stats.
Nick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBM/B8kwSf8WUZEy9xEQLC6gCg/q448BUvs51iZgObvq2HxgYciOMAn35V gIUaCXTXBV+R7ReZuK5bkuLs =dUE6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (4)
-
Greg Ketell -
John Hawkinson -
Nick Hilliard -
Paul G. Donner