RE: improving the registrar transfer process
Accountability. Responsibility.
I agree with you on this 100%. ICANN needs to enforce there current policies.
I agree too.
Look at totalnic/pacnames. They have been refusing transfer requests years now until very very recent. What has ICANN done about all those complaints and violations that has been well documented? nothing!
ICANN needs to stop just accepting money and start enforcing policies...
Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if they continued not to allow transfers for .com. See: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html The original judgment is at: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 10:28 +1100, Bruce Tonkin wrote:
Interestingly, the ICANN equivalent in Australia (auDA), does pro-actively enforce policies, and even took Capital Networks to court on the basis that they could be de-accredited as a registrar for .au, if they continued not to allow transfers for .com.
See:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2004/324.html
The original judgment is at:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2004/808.html
yes they did. now pacnames in another country supposedly bought capital... at least they are allowing you to transfer away this time though auDA being proactive is good...now its time icann is...
participants (2)
-
Bruce Tonkin
-
Thornton