Just as expected. It appears that it was a typo on someones part while configuring a ptp link. Notice that hop #2 no longer uses a UUnet address. Strange that the person who built the ptp circuit didn't catch it. 1 1.ATM6-0.CMH-0.WINSTAR.NET (209.140.29.9) [AS 5696] 0 msec 0 msec 4 msec 2 69.winstar.net (65.36.1.69) [AS 5696] 16 msec 16 msec 20 msec 3 pos2-0.wdc1-bb1.winstar.net (216.172.247.117) [AS 5696] 24 msec 24 msec 24 msec 4 7.atm8-0.vienna-0.winstar.net (65.36.0.130) [AS 5696] 24 msec 24 msec 24 msec 5 internic-goodnet.internic.net (209.54.51.90) [AS 5696] 28 msec 28 msec 24 msec 6 www.netsol.com (216.168.224.111) [AS 6245] 24 msec 28 msec 28 msec --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, John Fraizer wrote:

Did someone at WINSTAR typo an address on a ptp link?

1 1.ATM6-0.CMH-0.WINSTAR.NET (209.140.29.9) [AS 5696] 4 msec 0 msec 4 msec 2 4Cust5.tnt36.lax3.da.uu.net (63.36.1.69) [AS 701] 20 msec 20 msec 16 msec 3 pos2-0.wdc1-bb1.winstar.net (216.172.247.117) [AS 5696] 20 msec 24 msec 24 msec 4 7.atm8-0.vienna-0.winstar.net (65.36.0.130) [AS 5696] 24 msec 24 msec 24 msec 5 internic-goodnet.internic.net (209.54.51.90) [AS 5696] 24 msec 28 msec 28 msec 6 www.netsol.com (216.168.224.111) [AS 6245] 28 msec 28 msec 28 msec

--- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc