Hi all, I was wondering what those of you who are doing RADB/MCI-RR/ANS RA filtering were doing about large networks which do not register their networks in the RADB. It would seem unwise to simply trust their announcements, and even more unwise to simply ignore their announcements, so... Whats the common parctice in this scenario?
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Justin Newton wrote: |} I was wondering what those of you who are doing RADB/MCI-RR/ANS |} RA filtering were doing about large networks which do not register |} their networks in the RADB. It would seem unwise to simply trust their |} announcements, and even more unwise to simply ignore their |} announcements, so... Whats the common parctice in this scenario? Inverse filter what you know you don't want to hear from them. -jh-
I was wondering what those of you who are doing RADB/MCI-RR/ANS RA filtering were doing about large networks which do not register their networks in the RADB. It would seem unwise to simply trust their announcements, and even more unwise to simply ignore their announcements, so... Whats the common parctice in this scenario? If they are a customer they _are_ registered no matter how big they are. If they are a peer then we only do AS path filtering, providers get free rein, although in both cases I am considering deploying a filter that doesn't accept announcements for our (static) customers from either of them. Mark.
participants (3)
-
Jonathan Heiliger -
Justin Newton -
Mark Prior