can all current nanog threads move to nanog-ot@ plz?
here's how it looks just before i hit the "catch up" button. [ 23: mailman-owner@nanog.] nanog.org mailing list memberships reminder [ 90: "James Hess" ] Re: DNS and potential energy < 155: Marshall Eubanks > [ 22: John Levine ] < 35: "Jay R. Ashworth" > < 119: Rob Pickering > < 21: Tony Finch > Y -[ 82: Jeroen Massar ] REJECT-ON-SMTP-DATA (Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's [ 15: Roland Perry ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens [ 10: Roland Perry ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up [ 12: Stephane Bortzmeyer ] Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs < 23: Tony Finch > < 50: Phil Regnauld > [ 36: David Conrad ] TLDs and file extensions (Re: DNS and potential energy) Y - [ 30: michael.dillon@bt.co] [ 31: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] Re: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's [ 19: Joe Greco ] [ 135: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] RFC 1480 - does it generalize (was What Problem; was ICANN/Pandora) [ 60: Chris Owen ] Re: REJECT-ON-SMTP-DATA (Re: Mail Server best practices - was: [ 26: "Jay R. Ashworth" ] Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs -- Paul Vixie
participants (2)
-
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr.
-
Paul Vixie