Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine. Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine.
For which your customers are grateful....
Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
Mine prefers not to cheat. -- Jeff Shultz
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:41:35PM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine.
For which your customers are grateful....
Jeff Shultz
well... to answer the question (how do i hijack DNS lables to generate more traffic to my site?) - I suggest the following: *NOTE* - you may need to backout o an earlier version of BIND, then this will generate some increased traffic temporarally but will bring down the wrath of the ISP community on you... or, they might let you melt in your own stupidity... with that disclaimer:::: ; add these RR's to your zone $ORIGIN . *.com. IN A 127.0.0.1 *.net. IN A 127.0.0.1 *.org. IN AAAA ::1 ; end of temporary traffic generator as an aside, Cricket, you might want to write another book on stupid DNS tricks that don't work the way one thinkis they might. --bill
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:41:35PM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine.
If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for them, I say). The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not to do this. The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own. -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:41:35PM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine.
If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for them, I say).
The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not to do this.
The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own.
This comes from an "Attorney and Counselor-at-Law", and without a legal disclaimer? I'm shocked. I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it. Tuc/TBOH
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 12:12:41PM -0400):
bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote (on Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 10:26:43AM +0000):
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:41:35PM -0700, Jeff Shultz wrote:
leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine.
If you want a serious answer to your question, it's because your customers are not using your DNS servers to resolve queries (bully for them, I say).
The next (evil) step that you would have to take would be to intercept outbound DNS queries (or maybe just the replies, even more evil) and replace the answers with the ones you want. There are lots reasons not to do this.
The (slighty less evil, IMHO) other option would be for you to keep track of google.com's ips (not so easy, as you'll see once you try) and intercept web requests to those ips and replace them with your own.
This comes from an "Attorney and Counselor-at-Law", and without a legal disclaimer? I'm shocked.
Most electronic disclaimers aren't worth the paper they're printed upon. :-)
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
I kinda hoped that anyone reading the above would NOT get the impression I'm advocating this. I'm not (unless you're a country with population exceeding one billion, in which case you write your own rules. :-) -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy? -Jim P. (no legal disclaimer here)
I am shocked this many people responded to this post... -Ray -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu on behalf of Jim Popovitch Sent: Fri 8/17/2007 12:36 PM To: nanog Subject: Re: DNS not working On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy? -Jim P. (no legal disclaimer here)
On 18/08/2007, at 3:00 AM, Raymond L. Corbin wrote:
I am shocked this many people responded to this post...
-Ray
Just because something is possible it doesn't mean it should be done. It really is a Bad Idea (tm) to do stuff like falsifying DNS entries and all that kinda nasty stuff. Sure, it's possible - but that doesn't make it right.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu on behalf of Jim Popovitch Sent: Fri 8/17/2007 12:36 PM To: nanog Subject: Re: DNS not working
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy?
-Jim P.
(no legal disclaimer here)
-- Steven Haigh Email: netwiz@crc.id.au Web: http://www.crc.id.au Phone: (03) 9017 0597 - 0404 087 474
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 18/08/2007, at 3:00 AM, Raymond L. Corbin wrote:
I am shocked this many people responded to this post...
-Ray
Just because something is possible it doesn't mean it should be done. It really is a Bad Idea (tm) to do stuff like falsifying DNS entries and all that kinda nasty stuff. Sure, it's possible - but that doesn't make it right.
because it's messing with basic plumbing in an odd manner.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:36:07 EDT, Jim Popovitch said:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 12:12 -0400, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
I'm also shocked someone would actually advocate this. I'm sure Google wouldn't be too happy to find out about it.
This begs the question... why is the OP trying to do this with DNS instead of a caching proxy?
Because there is no "Your kloo must be this tall to ride the Internet" sign posted.
I think this thread is obviously silly, so please refrain from posting further on this and feeding the troll... Thanks! On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 leeyao@trashymail.com wrote:
Hi, I try adding google.com to my dns server to get more visitors but google.com still show search engine. Please advise how to do so more visitor in return? May the Gods be with you!
participants (11)
-
Alex Pilosov -
bmanning＠vacation.karoshi.com -
Chris L. Morrow -
Jeff Shultz -
Jim Popovitch -
leeyao＠trashymail.com -
Nachman Yaakov Ziskind -
Raymond L. Corbin -
Steven Haigh -
Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET -
Valdis.Kletnieks＠vt.edu