...

On Fri, 2 Apr 1999, TTSG wrote:

...

We were hoping that "Hack-Track" would be the forum. Check out http://www.hack-track.com for instructions.

Shouldnt that be cracker-tracker. It might be excusable for techology illiterate journalists to misuse the term "hack" but its inexcusable for computer professionals.

I'd rather not get into a discussion about this, since as an "ex-hacker" from 1978.... To me "hacker" is computer, "cracker" is software.

Tuc/TTSG

A hack is a clever (albeit not necessarily clean or well-structured) piece of code or a hardware modification which performs some function, usually added into some piece of hardware or software never intended to perform that function. A crack is the use of or a method to achieve the use of a system in a way not authorized by the systems owner. A hack can be used as a crack, but a hack is not necessarily abuse, a crack is. If you look at most of the common usages, this pretty well fits. Until recently, very few crackers wer not hackers as well. Until the advent of the web, it was not so easy for crackers to share their warez and methods with other less-experienced crackers. This lead to a situation where crackers pretty much had to figure things out for themselves. The web has changed that. Now any hacker who develops a crack can easily make the crack available to any number of crackers who wish to use it. This has lowered the barrier of entry for crackers substantially. Unfortunately, the media has continued to use the therm hacker as if it were synonymous with cracker. A hack, such as an email message which makes use of some vulnerability in sendmail to cause the system to notify the administrator that his sendmail is vulnerable, for example, is not a crack. However, if someone were to run it against a number of systems that he was not authorized to test for this vulnerability, that would then be a crack. Also, software which allows one to violate license enforcement provisions in other software is a crack. Again, it creates an unauthorised use. Owen