Re: Abuse procedures... Reality Checks
On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:00 PM, Fergie wrote:
I would think that it's actually very easy to do when sub-allocations are SWIP'ed.
Not that I'm really defending this policy, but sub-allocations are very often not SWIPed. I'd say 75% or more of the time I'm looking a
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - -- Chris Owen <owenc@hubris.net> wrote: problem IP address it is part of a /19 or larger block with no sub- allocation.
Please read what I wrote: "I would think that it's actually very easy to do when sub-allocations are SWIP'ed." I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-) - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214) wj8DBQFGGCw4q1pz9mNUZTMRAgEDAKCB4eiFluFcXcYlSj4EjleHpxy8PgCg26ei sZW4CKfCOm5H3KOGQsxYd8w= =ZoDl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg(at)netzero.net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Apr 7, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Fergie wrote:
Please read what I wrote:
"I would think that it's actually very easy to do when sub-allocations are SWIP'ed."
I cannot, and will not, presuppose that in cases when they are not SWIP'ed that some kind of magic happens. :-)
And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed. Its even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19. Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Chris Owen ~ Garden City (620) 275-1900 ~ Lottery (noun): President ~ Wichita (316) 858-3000 ~ A stupidity tax Hubris Communications Inc www.hubris.net ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQFGGC0QElUlCLUT2d0RAsmbAJ4i/YNj7vypKJ0Zv/7ajWIGdpwvbgCdECZB v+FoC+s1TRkdkSBZMzEYU94= =6CPl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
And how do you know the difference? The Cox IP address is SWIPed. Its even sub-allocated. The allocation is just a /19.
Exactly, so why not just block whatever the suballocation is? Would mean that companies that properly SWIP their IP-blocks and put in the effort to maintain them, are given an advantage to companies that do not. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
participants (3)
-
Chris Owen -
Fergie -
Mikael Abrahamsson