At 11:03 AM 1/8/97 -0600, Chris A. Icide wrote:
Would anyone be interested in a short discussion on something like "Properties of an improved routing protocol"?
This type of discussion would be better served taking place within the IETF, not NANOG. $.02, - paul
My thought here is just a short discussion (Round Table) that might throw proposed ideas for an improved routing protocol.
For example:
Supports policy based routing (BGP stuff) supports server - server and server - client modes supports link quality, delay, reliability, etc supports QOS
etc., etc.,
Chris A. Icide Nap.Net, L.L.C.
Paul,
At 11:03 AM 1/8/97 -0600, Chris A. Icide wrote:
Would anyone be interested in a short discussion on something like "Properties of an improved routing protocol"?
This type of discussion would be better served taking place within the IETF, not NANOG.
Agreed. And to be more specific, I would suggest bgp/idr mailing list. Yakov.
participants (2)
-
Paul Ferguson -
Yakov Rekhter