Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 21:19:39 -0500 (EST) From: Gordon Cook <gcook@tigger.jvnc.net> Subject: Re: SF NAP status To: Frank Liu <fcliu@srv.pacbell.com> Cc: nap-info@merit.edu, nanog@merit.edu, yclee@srv.pacbell.com, mwfishe@srv.pacbell.com, hhso@srv.pacbell.com, marudik@srv. pacbell.com, cxyuan@srv.pacbell.com, fcliu@srv.pacbell.com, jmverge@srv.pacbell.com, rcmacie@srv.pacbell.com, kxliu@srv. pacbell.com, deargue@srv.pacbell.com, 73044.322@compuserve.com, 0002709394@mcimail.com In-Reply-To: <9411120158.AA28814@pop.srv.PacBell.COM> Message-Id: <Pine.3.87.9411112139.A14656-0100000@tigger.jvnc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

Two things seem strange. Why is Sprint only thinking about connecting to the california NAP? I thought it was mandatory for sprint to do so?? Why is sprint late?

Please be advised, Sprint will connect to all 3 priority NAPs. The order should be received very soon. Thanks Bob Collet Director, Engineering and Operations Network Systems and Internet Services Sprint

2nd question: for those of us outside of california...what the heck is the PUC thing all about?

******************************************************************** Gordon Cook, Editor & Publisher Subscr.: Individ $85 The COOK Report on Internet -> NREN Non Prof., Gov't & 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 Small Corp $175 (609) 882-2572 Corp. Site Lic $500 Internet: gcook@tigger.jvnc.net Monthly policy & tech news ********************************************************************