Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
In this WSJ article http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704893604576199952421569210.ht... or http://on.wsj.com/gaPk8V This caught my eye : About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ... It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen. Regards Marshall
Hi Marshall and all,
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true. Rgs, Masato
-----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme@americafree.tv] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
In this WSJ article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999 52421569210.html
or
This caught my eye :
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Regards Marshall
On Mar 14, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Masato YAMANISHI wrote:
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true.
I'd like to see a list of damaged cables. I thought a lot of capacity was installed which did not go through Japan, so half the capacity across the Pacific would be most of the capacity into Japan. Or such is my understanding, which may be incorrect. Does someone have data? -- TTFN, patrick
Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following: 213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL) 193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET) 174.132.0.0/15 (NETBLK-THEPLANET-BLK-15) 65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0) Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months ago). *sigh* Getting multiple brute force and/or spam from single IPs within those ranges against different devices on different dates. Gav -----Original Message----- From: Masato YAMANISHI [mailto:myamanis@japan-telecom.com] Sent: 14 March 2011 16:16 To: 'Marshall Eubanks'; 'NANOG list' Subject: RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Hi Marshall and all,
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true. Rgs, Masato
-----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme@americafree.tv] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
In this WSJ article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999 52421569210.html
or
This caught my eye :
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Regards Marshall
Just a quick update to the below message, I have a contact for The Planet, if anyone has a contact for any of the following, would be much appreciated: 64.167.200.160/29 (SBCIS-1001120-113647) [new] 213.123.192.0/20 (BT-ADSL) 193.179.160.0/22 (KULAJ-NET) 65.75.128.0/18 (MSG-65-75-128-0) Many thanks, Gavin -----Original Message----- From: Gavin Pearce [mailto:Gavin.Pearce@3seven9.com] Sent: 15 March 2011 11:48 To: NANOG list Subject: 213.123.192.0/20 | 193.179.160.0/22 | 174.132.0.0/15 | 65.75.128.0/18 Morning all - anyone here responsible for any of the following: Abuse/Technical contacts gone unanswered for each (mailed 1 - 2 months ago). *sigh* Getting multiple brute force and/or spam from single IPs within those ranges against different devices on different dates. Gav -----Original Message----- From: Masato YAMANISHI [mailto:myamanis@japan-telecom.com] Sent: 14 March 2011 16:16 To: 'Marshall Eubanks'; 'NANOG list' Subject: RE: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables Hi Marshall and all,
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Yes, it's definetely true. Rgs, Masato
-----Original Message----- From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:tme@americafree.tv] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 8:54 AM To: NANOG list Subject: Rush to Fix Quake-Damaged Undersea Cables
In this WSJ article
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487048936045761999 52421569210.html
or
This caught my eye :
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
It that realistic ? That seems like much more damage than anything I have heard or seen.
Regards Marshall
Open-source FlowViewer version 3.4 has been released. FlowViewer is a web-based companion set of tools to Mark Fullmer's flow-tools netflow capture and analysis tool suite. FlowViewer enables users to analyze and track traffic through their network. Users can quickly and easily create textual reports, graphical reports, or long-term tracking reports on any specified subset of their network traffic. FlowViewer v3.4 can be downloaded from: http://ensight.eos.nasa.gov/FlowViewer/ Regards, Joe Loiacono
In a message written on Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:54:15AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
About half of the existing cables running across the Pacific are damaged ...
If you have a broad view of damaged, this may be plausable. Remember that "damaged" does not mean traffic impacting in all cases, for instance... - one side of a redundant cable impacted, so no down time to actual traffic on 1+1 circuits. - Landing station in Japan has damage, or even simply no power and is running on generator. So perhaps all services are up, but it's now got to be kept fueled, and/or physical damage may require repairs in the near future. Due to great circle routing distances a lot of pacific cables go near Japan or have Japanese landing sites on their northern paths, even if going further south. I would like to see some more specific data about the types of damage to the cables, and expected time to repair. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
participants (6)
-
Gavin Pearce -
Joe Loiacono -
Leo Bicknell -
Marshall Eubanks -
Masato YAMANISHI -
Patrick W. Gilmore