Providing IPv4 Services in an IPv6 Backbone
Hi all, Have there been any gap closures on RFC7439? I am particularly interested in 4PE, 4VPE, and other MPLS enabled services like L3VPN, NG-MVPN, E-Line, E-LAN, and EVPN. Does Juniper have an "ipv4-tunneling" mpls keyword? Thanks, Jason
On 10/21/21 21:18, Jason Iannone wrote:
Hi all,
Have there been any gap closures on RFC7439? I am particularly interested in 4PE, 4VPE, and other MPLS enabled services like L3VPN, NG-MVPN, E-Line, E-LAN, and EVPN. Does Juniper have an "ipv4-tunneling" mpls keyword?
I posted this here earlier this month: https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2021-October/215609.html Unaware of any other vendor who claims to have solved this problem. Mark.
Thanks for sharing. Maybe I have blinders on, but LDPv6 and the v6 SR flavors don't have much use if v4 CE sites aren't supported. Jason On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 12:56 AM Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa> wrote:
On 10/21/21 21:18, Jason Iannone wrote:
Hi all,
Have there been any gap closures on RFC7439? I am particularly interested in 4PE, 4VPE, and other MPLS enabled services like L3VPN, NG-MVPN, E-Line, E-LAN, and EVPN. Does Juniper have an "ipv4-tunneling" mpls keyword?
I posted this here earlier this month:
https://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2021-October/215609.html
Unaware of any other vendor who claims to have solved this problem.
Mark.
On 10/22/21 15:19, Jason Iannone wrote:
Thanks for sharing. Maybe I have blinders on, but LDPv6 and the v6 SR flavors don't have much use if v4 CE sites aren't supported.
Indeed. If your goal is an IPv6-only network with IPv6-only services, then Nokia may have an answer for you. But if you want IPv4-as-a-Service over an IPv6-only network (4PE or 4VPE), then I'd recommend beating up the vendors. I'd start with Nokia, since by all accounts, they seem to be leading the charge at this point. Mark.
participants (2)
-
Jason Iannone -
Mark Tinka