What you want is something that isn't the Internet or even a hop-by-hop destination-based connectionless packet network, but rather something akin to X.25 or ATM.
Sean.
...which requires even more state kept in gateways, and therefore more CPU required to maintain that state. Film at 11. --vadim
What you want is something that isn't the Internet or even a hop-by-hop destination-based connectionless packet network, but rather something akin to X.25 or ATM.
Sean.
...which requires even more state kept in gateways, and therefore more CPU required to maintain that state.
Film at 11.
--vadim
CPUs are cheap. One 133 MHz Pentium cost less than either of us make in a day..... In six months, even cheaper. Tim
...which requires even more state kept in gateways, and therefore more CPU required to maintain that state.
Film at 11.
--vadim
CPUs are cheap. One 133 MHz Pentium cost less than either of us make in a day..... In six months, even cheaper.
And exactly which platforms are optomized to take advantage of the P133? Not too many. You'd be better off running a multi-processor Sparc 20 w/Solaris (ewwww.) Dave -- Dave Siegel Director of Engineering, Net99 http://www.webcity.com/ (602)249-1083 24x7 NOC line http://www.rtd.com/~dsiegel/ (520)318-0696 My Tucson Office
participants (3)
-
Dave Siegel -
Tim Bass -
Vadim Antonov