"There is no data to indicate the core operation of the domain name system or the stability of the Internet has been adversely affected," VeriSign's Galvin said.
This means that there are no papers published or conference presentations which detail the problems caused by sitefinder. A number of people who posted messages to this list could rectify that lack of data by writing up their findings in a short paper and presenting it at a conference or publishing it in a magazine or journal. I don't think the fight is over yet. --Michael Dillon
On 06.10 10:54, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote:
"There is no data to indicate the core operation of the domain name system or the stability of the Internet has been adversely affected," VeriSign's Galvin said.
This means that there are no papers published or conference presentations which detail the problems caused by sitefinder.
http://www.iab.org/documents/docs/2003-09-20-dns-wildcards.html
Quite the opposite. It is a very carefully chosen set of words indicating that: 1. DNS didn't stop functioning. 2. The internet did not fail to route packets because of this. It carefully side-steps the other issues raised without looking like it is ignoring them. Verisign is a lousy DNS provider and an even worse registry/registrar, but, they have great press writers. Owen --On Monday, October 6, 2003 10:54 AM +0100 Michael.Dillon@radianz.com wrote:
"There is no data to indicate the core operation of the domain name system or the stability of the Internet has been adversely affected," VeriSign's Galvin said.
This means that there are no papers published or conference presentations which detail the problems caused by sitefinder. A number of people who posted messages to this list could rectify that lack of data by writing up their findings in a short paper and presenting it at a conference or publishing it in a magazine or journal.
I don't think the fight is over yet.
--Michael Dillon
participants (3)
-
Daniel Karrenberg -
Michael.Dillon＠radianz.com -
Owen DeLong