Pim Van, i am just looking for a alternative way. i don't need this stupid SixXs at all anymore. also, Pim, are you Pim for Multicast? no IGMP? :D :) Thank you ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pim van Pelt" <pim@ipng.nl> To: "Meftah Tayeb" <tayeb.meftah@gmail.com> Cc: <ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de>; <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:28 PM Subject: Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

Hoi,

Meftah perhaps you mailed the wrong people -- you seem to be specifically addressing SixXS, but you mailed nanog@nanog.org and ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de, both of which may not be able to authoritatively answer your questions.

...

why SIXXS is very strict like that ? I suppose it's up to SixXS to define their policy (one account per

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Meftah Tayeb <tayeb.meftah@gmail.com> wrote: person comes to mind *) and revise it if they see a need. They are free to accept or reject any user and I do not believe they have an obligation to serve any given user (ie access is a privilege not a right), and I think they have a right to ask for information just as much as users have a right to not use their service if they believe the amount of information SixXS wants to know about them and their intended use is too much. In general I think they are rather transparent about rejection reasons, in your case likely because you neglected to heed the FAQ item on one account per person.

I'm not sure bringing this up in the scope of nanog or ipv6-ops is productive. It's not clear to me, except for your plethora of questions, what you are trying to accomplish.

I'm sorry you feel that SixXS is not the right place for you. Luckily there's plenty of choice in high quality tunnelbrokers, as others in this thread have pointed out.

groet, Pim

*) http://www.sixxs.net/faq/account/?faq=oneaccount -- Pim van Pelt <pim@ipng.nl> PBVP1-RIPE - http://www.ipng.nl/

__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________

Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com

__________ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __________ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com