While researching an RFC1997 issue this morning, I made the following observations: According to RFC1997: " Well-known Communities The following communities have global significance and their operations shall be implemented in any community-attribute-aware BGP speaker. NO_EXPORT (0xFFFFFF01) All routes received carrying a communities attribute containing this value MUST NOT be advertised outside a BGP confederation boundary (a stand-alone autonomous system that is not part of a confederation should be considered a confederation itself). NO_ADVERTISE (0xFFFFFF02) All routes received carrying a communities attribute containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to other BGP peers. NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED (0xFFFFFF03) All routes received carrying a communities attribute containing this value MUST NOT be advertised to external BGP peers (this includes peers in other members autonomous systems inside a BGP confederation). " On Cisco's site at http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/np1_c... I find the following: " internet - Advertise this route to the Internet community. All routers belong to it. no-export - Do not advertise this route to EBGP peers. no-advertise - Do not advertise this route to any peer (internal or external). local-as - Send this route to peers in other sub-autonomous systems within the local confederation. Do not advertise this route to an external system. " Unless I'm mistaken, there are some potential interop issues with this. CISCO no-export = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED CISCO no-advertise = RFC1997 NO_ADVERTISE CISCO local-as = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT Can someone more familiar with the RFC1997 implementation in IOS comment on this? Thanks, --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
While researching an RFC1997 issue this morning, I made the following observations:
CISCO no-export = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED CISCO local-as = RFC1997 NO_EXPORT
Cisco Press' Routing TCP/IP, Vol 2 explicitly states that LOCAL_AS == NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED. It's description of LOCAL_AS differs, however, from the one you quoted from a Cisco web page: "LOCAL_AS (4294967043, or 0xFFFFFF03) -- RFC 1997 calls this attribute NO_EXPORT_SUBCONFED. Routes received carrying this value cannot be advertised to EBGP peers, including peers in other autonomous systems within a confederation." My money is on the Cisco web page you quoted being wrong. Marko --
Magenta Sites Marko Karppinen
participants (2)
-
John Fraizer
-
Marko Karppinen