Re: [off-topic] old NSFNET regionals?
Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 20:26:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Alan Hannan <hannan@bondage.bythetrees.com> Cc: Tung-Hui Hu <hhui@arcfour.com>, nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: [off-topic] old NSFNET regionals? [...] MRNet Minnesota Minneapolis MRNet ^^^^^ MRNet never had its own NSFNET Backbone node. Rather it connected via a 56kbps link to the node at UIUC. The link was later upgraded to T1 until MRNet migrated to CICNet.
A different form of the question is: Where were the NSFNET backbone nodes located? There was an odd mapping between backbone nodes and regionals, (e.g., some sites which hosted NSFNET backbone nodes created regionals, other sites didn't, and some regionals, typically those formed later, didn't have their "own" backbone nodes). -tjs
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Tim Salo wrote:
A different form of the question is: Where were the NSFNET backbone nodes located? There was an odd mapping between backbone nodes and regionals, (e.g., some sites which hosted NSFNET backbone nodes created regionals, other sites didn't, and some regionals, typically those formed later, didn't have their "own" backbone nodes).
I seem to recall that each case was "special" in its own way, and no two were alike. For example, CICNet connected to NSFnet at NSF nodes in Ann Arbor (U of Mich + Merit), Chicago (Argonne National Labs) and Champaign (UIUC + NCSA) typically by sitting on the DMZ FDDI off of the NSSes. -dorian
I believe that this was sent to the wrong address. At 10:07 PM -0600 5/27/97, Dorian R. Kim wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 1997, Tim Salo wrote:
A different form of the question is: Where were the NSFNET backbone nodes located? There was an odd mapping between backbone nodes and regionals, (e.g., some sites which hosted NSFNET backbone nodes created regionals, other sites didn't, and some regionals, typically those formed later, didn't have their "own" bac
participants (3)
-
Dorian R. Kim -
Gary Thomas -
salo＠msc.edu