Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
This is news, it would be great if more details were available. Anyone? ========================================= John Jason Brzozowski Comcast Cable m) +1-609-377-6594 e) mailto:john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com o) +1-484-962-0060 w) http://www.comcast6.net ========================================= -----Original Message----- From: "nanog-request@nanog.org" <nanog-request@nanog.org> Reply-To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 9:20 PM To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: NANOG Digest, Vol 60, Issue 113
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:16:40 -0500 (EST) From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> To: Cutler James R <james.cutler@consultant.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: "Programmers can't get IPv6 thus that is why they do not have IPv6 in their applications".... Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301302210440.4289@whammy.cluebyfour.org> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
Comcast removed the "no IPv6" excuse? That removal somehow skipped my house in Washington DC where they installed (last October) a router which does not even support it (an Arrus voice gateway- the one where you can't turn of the crummy 2.4g wireless radio) and none of the folks I've spoken to on the phone can tell me when or if it will be coming.
I know Verizon is rolling out v6 in some areas of their FiOS footprint. The router they provided supports it, but what I got from their customer service people was that they ran into some sort of issue with their TV set-top boxes working properly with IPv6 or at least in a dual-stack environment. At least that's where things stand in Pittsburgh.
I don't think they've provided training to their customer service people on IPv6 yet. The rep I spoke with a few weeks ago told me I was the first customer that has asked her about it.
Looking forward to native v6 / dual-stack here...
jms
participants (1)
-
Brzozowski, John