Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:59:20 -0500 From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@csh.rit.edu> Subject: Re: reverse Traceroute
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:34:26AM -0800, Matthew Schlegel wrote:
I agree. Very cool. Now we just need to get guys like google and msn to put a client or two in their web farms so that those of us with users to deal ("I can't get to MSN, your network is broken") with can trace to and from their farms directly...
If only it didn't require running untrusted, binary code with superuser privileges.
- -- - mdz
This is exactly why the source to tltrace is freely available for download and public review. http://www.traceloop/download/tltrace-0.91b-1.src.tar.gz skm
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 09:49:15AM -0800, Miller, Scott wrote:
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 15:59:20 -0500 From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@csh.rit.edu> Subject: Re: reverse Traceroute
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:34:26AM -0800, Matthew Schlegel wrote:
I agree. Very cool. Now we just need to get guys like google and msn to put a client or two in their web farms so that those of us with users to deal ("I can't get to MSN, your network is broken") with can trace to and from their farms directly...
If only it didn't require running untrusted, binary code with superuser privileges.
This is exactly why the source to tltrace is freely available for download and public review.
Thanks for the pointer. Where is this linked from the www.traceloop.com site? I can't find it. Also, why is the version number different from the binary archive (traceloop-0.12a.tar.gz)? It might be a good idea to provide a link to this archive in the introductory email, for those of us who aren't running Linux/i386. You might even get some help in the way of portability fixes. -- - mdz
participants (2)
-
Matt Zimmerman -
Miller, Scott