Can we call on the Avian Carrier RFC here? Packet Loss may take on a whole new meaning here... K (sorry, couldn't resist)

-----Original Message----- From: Mark E. Perkins [mailto:meperkins@att.com] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 9:42 AM To: Randy Bush; Charles Smith Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Packet Loss

Perhaps you mean 2680? (As in RFC)

--On Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:20 PM +0000 Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

...

...

Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so,

please send me

...

...

the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict definition.

2628