you keep missing the most obvious interpretation: 1.85% of exodus's output goes to bbn. 10-30% of bbn's input is from exodus. this may still be a ridiculous figure, but maybe not, if exodus is hosting 30 of the top 100 web sites.

...

...

...

...

off. Let's face the facts, BBN is only 1.85% of my traffic. By all accounts, we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic. Lots of luck. We actually see a massively inverted benefit scale in this particular situation.

It seems intuitively reasonable to me that 1.85% of Exodus input comes from BBN. No arguments there. I would like to know where the "By all accounts, we estimate to be in the area of 10-30% of their traffic." sentence comes from. Are you suggesting that 10-30% of BBN's total output goes to Exodus? Or that 10-30% of Exodus output goes to BBN?

The first scenario is ridiculous. The second scenario is possible, but I would suspect it is closer to 10% than 30%.

-dsr-

...Still not speaking for the company...