I'm quite aware of v6 implementation efforts; my point was that the *scale* at which v6 is actually being implemented is by no means, 'wide'. I suppose, however, that this is quite a subjective statement from both perspectives. I also hesitate to mention that there is a significant part of the industry that still questions the immediate need for IPv6, or perhaps has not been convinced that IPv6 actually fixes any existing problems, but that is another can of worms altogether and is better discussed in another venue. - paul (not representative of cisco Systems, Inc.) At 08:57 AM 1/4/97 -0500, Thomas Narten wrote:

...

...

May I please point out that this discussion has not mentioned the wide scale implementation of IPv6 or some derrivative thereof.

...

What wide-scale implementation?

Chose your words carefully. What major vendor is _not_ "implementing" IPv6? Be sure to check:

http://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng/html/ipng-implementations.html http://www.research.microsoft.com/research/os/

Thomas