Hi All, I hope this mail is appropriate for the charter of Nanog. Pardon me if it is not. Could someone comment on: Normally, is there is a need to run both IS-IS and OSPF on the same interface on a router? How does the vendors today support this? Thanks a million, --Johnson
On Fri, Jul 30, 1999 at 12:51:49PM -0400, Johnson Kuruvila wrote:
Normally, is there is a need to run both IS-IS and OSPF on the same interface on a router? How does the vendors today support this?
I can't see any reason to run both. They are both IGP's, and you really only need one, actually running two gives you nothing but trouble. So pick one, both has advantages, we picked ISIS because of the ability to have larger areas, and the ability to increase the update timers. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
participants (2)
-
Jesper Skriver -
Johnson Kuruvila