RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:25 PM To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Jim Dempsey (E-mail); North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP wrote:
[SNIP]
A SPAN port could satisfy an ISP's obligations under TitleIII/ECPA, but not satisfy CALEA.
What is required is TCAP information and bearer traffic. Typically delivered off the switch back to the LEA collector via a DS0. The TCAP information can be delivered in a multitude of ways.
It won't make any difference. Anyone (barring complete idiots) will encrypt the traffic with long keys. Curtis -- Curtis Maurand mailto:curtis@maurand.com http://www.maurand.com On Sun, 20 Jun 2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]On Behalf Of Sean Donelan Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 10:25 PM To: Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP Cc: Steven M. Bellovin; Jim Dempsey (E-mail); North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes Subject: RE: [Fwd: [IP] Feds: VoIP a potential haven for terrorists]
On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Cade,Marilyn S - LGCRP wrote:
[SNIP]
A SPAN port could satisfy an ISP's obligations under TitleIII/ECPA, but not satisfy CALEA.
What is required is TCAP information and bearer traffic. Typically delivered off the switch back to the LEA collector via a DS0. The TCAP information can be delivered in a multitude of ways.
participants (2)
-
Curtis Maurand -
Hannigan, Martin