Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)
On Tue, 01 February 2000, Bill Woodcock wrote:
I agree entirely. I can't stand it when people are too sheepish to publish Best Common Practices just because there are a few companies that don't feel like putting in the effort to do a halfway decent job. God knows we wouldn't want anyone to feel left out, even if they do insist on running open relays, or redistributing their IGP or whatever. Bleah.
Do you mean like http://dranet.dra.com/draft-donelan-rnmg-latest.txt
At 11:10 AM 2/1/00 -0800, Sean Donelan wrote: On Tue, 01 February 2000, Bill Woodcock wrote:
I agree entirely. I can't stand it when people are too sheepish to publish Best Common Practices just because there are a few companies that don't feel like putting in the effort to do a halfway decent job. God knows we wouldn't want anyone to feel left out, even if they do insist on running open relays, or redistributing their IGP or whatever. Bleah.
Indeed. I did not mean to suggest that such a thing (BCP) shouldn't be done, but rather set expectations that some may try to create a perception of participation while continually dragging feet, objecting to minor points, etc. to slow progress. So, press on, I look forward to seeing progress in this area. thanks, dave
participants (2)
-
dave o'leary
-
Sean Donelan