UUNet / ATT peering meltdown?
Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're not an ATT customer. UUNet --> ATT 6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 ms 7 137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms 419.819 ms ATT --> UUNet 8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec 20 msec 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 msec 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 msec 388 msec Thanks. -travis
Travis Pugh wrote:
Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're not an ATT customer.
I've reported a few problems as an ATT Broadband customer, and gotten nowhere. From the cable modem at my house, a traceroute to www.uu.net goes through a router that introduces a 400ms minimum delay. Traces to ftp.uu.net, in a different netblock, don't incur that delay. It appears there's a problem between these two, and it affects only some netblocks and not others.
UUNet --> ATT
6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 ms 7 137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms 419.819 ms
ATT --> UUNet
8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec 20 msec 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 msec 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 msec 388 msec
Thanks.
-travis
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts@senie.com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
Does anyone know if this is still and issue? Joe Marr -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Senie Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:12 PM To: Travis Pugh Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: UUNet / ATT peering meltdown? Travis Pugh wrote:
Not to open up any potential disputes, but has anyone heard what is going on between UUNet and AT&T on the east coast? We've been seeing this kind of performance for a week ... standard UUNet NOC response was "it's ATT's problem, call them" which doesn't do me a whole lot of good since we're not an ATT customer.
I've reported a few problems as an ATT Broadband customer, and gotten nowhere. From the cable modem at my house, a traceroute to www.uu.net goes through a router that introduces a 400ms minimum delay. Traces to ftp.uu.net, in a different netblock, don't incur that delay. It appears there's a problem between these two, and it affects only some netblocks and not others.
UUNet --> ATT
6 POS6-0.BR3.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.24.97) 9.212 ms 9.633 ms 10.363 ms 7 137.39.52.74 (137.39.52.74) 9.642 ms 12.967 ms 12.137 ms 8 gbr3-p50.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.1.122) 418.555 ms 416.419 ms 419.819 ms
ATT --> UUNet
8 ggr1-p370.attga.ip.att.net (12.123.20.253) [AS 7018] 20 msec 24 msec 20 msec 9 att-gw.atl.uu.net (192.205.32.130) [AS 7018] 396 msec 396 msec 392 msec 10 179.at-6-0-0.XR1.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.82.190) [AS 701] 388 msec 388 msec 388 msec
Thanks.
-travis
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Daniel Senie dts@senie.com Amaranth Networks Inc. http://www.amaranth.com
participants (3)
-
Daniel Senie -
Joe Marr -
Travis Pugh