Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!!
resorting to petty insults and attacks is indicative of a weak position. try again with actual content. On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:
No, I don't think you "get it" at all Ben.
jack
From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard@boardwatch.com> Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 6:58 PM
and we are getting what we pay for, aren't we?
On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Jack Rickard wrote:
We looked at some of the Inverse work. It appears that it is very influenced by whomever will pay $50,000 for the full report. We'll
---------- pass on
this work, and I'll pass on further comment beyond that.
I will say that there will be no $50,000 reports issuing from Boardwatch Magazine, Inc.
Jack Rickard
=================================================================== Jack Rickard Boardwatch Magazine Editor/Publisher 8500 West Bowles Ave., Ste. 210 jack.rickard@boardwatch.com Littleton, CO 80123 www.boardwatch.com Voice: (303)973-6038 ===================================================================
----------
From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: Craig A. Huegen <c-huegen@quadrunner.com> Cc: Jack Rickard <jack.rickard@boardwatch.com>; Peter Cole <Peter.Cole@telescan.com>; nanog@merit.edu; marketing@keynote.com Subject: Re: Keynote/Boardwatch Internet Backbone Index A better test!!! Date: Friday, June 27, 1997 2:28 PM
for an exmple of somewhat more complete and better designed benchmarks of
this type:
http://www.inversenet.com/about/backgrounder.html#2
note that they understand the numerous factors that contribute to overall
performance. only a marketing droid could think downloading 50k worth of
web pages is somehow an indicator of overall performance.
b3n
participants (1)
-
Ben Black