Mea maxima culpa and an apology to Samsung and its law firm. I'm a bit too touchy about spam having had quite a bad experience with it as previously described on this list. This explains but does not excuse my firing off without investigating first. I have read the CyberTimes article, which is NOT in today (8/12/97) NY Times (nor yesterday), which I've read completely. I subscribe to the paper edition and read it or skim it daily 7 days (I'm a New Yorker, some say Times subscription is a residency requirement, at least on the Upper West Side :-) ). Dana Hudes Graphnet
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Dana Hudes wrote:
Mea maxima culpa and an apology to Samsung and its law firm. I'm a bit too touchy about spam having had quite a bad experience
with it as previously described on this list. This explains but does not excuse my firing off without investigating first. I have read the CyberTimes article, which is NOT in today (8/12/97) NY Times (nor yesterday), which I've read completely. I subscribe to the paper edition and read it or skim it daily 7 days (I'm a New Yorker, some say Times subscription is a residency requirement, at least on the Upper West Side :-) ).
To save the few old timers still reading the list ...... What on earth has this to do with nanog? Have we completely given up talking about network operations now? <sigh> --- David ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do!
Well, I just got another different one yesterday. It goes on for about 20 pages, but I've listed the headers here. Received: from web1.asia1.com.sg (web1.asia1.com.sg [203.116.23.60]) by mail.mc.net (8.8.6/8.8.2) with ESMTP id NAA16092 for <burrito@mc.net>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 13:37:38 -0500 (CDT) From: webmaster@sec.samsung.com Received: from web1.asia1.com.sg (1Cust124.max67.los-angeles.ca.ms.uu.net [153.34.103.252]) by web1.asia1.com.sg (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id CAA15949; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 02:20:50 +0800 (SGT) Received: from mips-1.sailahead.com (mips-1.sailahead.com [199.107.95.10]) by samsung.co.kr (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA03731 for <Net_Users@in_cyberspace.com>; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 11:03:16 -0600 (EST) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 97 11:03:16 EST To: Net_Users@in_cyberspace.com Subject: A Word About Exciting Hih-Tech & Industry Message-ID: <5.0.52.19970916663666.666a6g97@sailahead.com> Reply-To: public_relations@sosimple.com X-PMFLAGS: 34666848 0 Comments: Authenticated sender is <webmaster@sec.samsung.com> X-UIDL: 3273376668a65ag1890m0762123a X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 We at Samsung welcome all Internet subscribers to visit our web sites to meet the real Samsung, the high-tech and industrial leader! http://www.samsungla.com http://www/sosimple.com http://www.samsung.co.kr http://samsungelectronics.com http://www.sec.samsung.com Or write to us c/o: webmaster@sec.samsung.com david@sparks.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 1997, Dana Hudes wrote:
Mea maxima culpa and an apology to Samsung and its law firm. I'm a bit too touchy about spam having had quite a bad experience
with it as previously described on this list. This explains but does not excuse my firing off without investigating first. I have read the CyberTimes article, which is NOT in today (8/12/97) NY Times (nor yesterday), which I've read completely. I subscribe to the paper edition and read it or skim it daily 7 days (I'm a New Yorker, some say Times subscription is a residency requirement, at least on the Upper West Side :-) ).
To save the few old timers still reading the list ......
What on earth has this to do with nanog?
Have we completely given up talking about network operations now?
<sigh>
--- David
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when one doesn't know what one can't do!
-- Stephen Dolloff (Systems Administrator - McHenryCom)
participants (3)
-
david＠sparks.net -
dhudes＠graphnet.com -
Stephen Dolloff