d.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707122342300.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696AB85.1030407@in oc.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707130039220.29164@uplift.swm.pp.se> <4696B668.2080807@i noc.net> <4696C8DA.3070101@bogus.com> <4696D017.7010100@inoc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0B45439E-DD83-47F7-B5B7-8647EDF30A70@zill.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Patrick Giagnocavo <patrick@zill.net> Subject: Re: peter lothberg's mother slashdotted Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:53:03 -0400 To: nanog@nanog.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: owner-nanog@merit.edu Precedence: bulk Errors-To: owner-nanog@merit.edu X-Loop: nanog X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mozart.merit.edu X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A090208.4696EA15.004A:SCGAP167720,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=198.108.1.26, so=2006-09-22 03:48:54, dmn=5.3.14/2007-05-31 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: NonJunk X-UID: 49 On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:

I know the intention of the article was to demonstrate the technological advantage of fiber optic networking vs. other technologies, but to mask the article around something that seems to indicate that "40GB to the home" is somehow the current benchmark is incredibly unrealistic.

-Robert

What would be the best way to phrase it? 40TTH? GTTH (gigabit to the home)? If you can use the Indian name for 10 million in there somewhere, you can brag about "quad-crore" speeds ... --Patrick