Nanog, Does anyone have information on performance numbers comparing tinydns vs. bind w/ dlz patch? Hit me up off-list. /m
And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll their own...? On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:17, Micah McNelly wrote:
Nanog,
Does anyone have information on performance numbers comparing tinydns vs. bind w/ dlz patch?
Hit me up off-list.
/m --
Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV tel: +31.10.7507008 fax: +31.10.7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:17 +0100, Erik Haagsman wrote:
And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll their own...?
That is called PowerDNS with a bind-backend ;) Rolling your own is of course the best version as you can customize it the way you like, hook it where you want etc. Then again you can do that with PowerDNS too and with a lot of scripting basically with anything. Greets, Jeroen
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:24, Jeroen Massar wrote:
That is called PowerDNS with a bind-backend ;)
AFAIK PowerDNS is only able to use BIND zone files as a data back-end, not a BIND DLZ database not to mention this will make PowerDNS the DNS server instead of BIND, which is exactly what I want to move away from. Cheers, -- --- Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV tel: +31.10.7507008 fax: +31.10.7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl
I second the recommendation for PowerDNS. I built an anycasted, sql backended instant-update DNS server platform for a registrar who was interested in selling a "premium dns service" product. We looked long and hard at bind+dlz as well as PDNS. Both are great products, and the developer who works on the DLZ code is a great guy, but we were able to squeeze a lot more queries per second out of PDNS. matto On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Jeroen Massar wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 20:17 +0100, Erik Haagsman wrote:
And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll their own...?
That is called PowerDNS with a bind-backend ;) Rolling your own is of course the best version as you can customize it the way you like, hook it where you want etc. Then again you can do that with PowerDNS too and with a lot of scripting basically with anything. Greets, Jeroen --matt@snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, just me wrote: I second the recommendation for PowerDNS. Dear Nanog, My apologies for not reading down the thread and seeing that the OP was looking for a way to *stop* using powerdns. My apologies also for failing once again to sign my post with my full, legal name, which is the entire purpose of this post. Love, Matt Ghali SSN 555-12-1212 --matt@snark.net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
probind2.sf.net It is not Postgresql and DLZ, it generates zones using MySQL database. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Haagsman" <erik@we-dare.net> To: "Micah McNelly" <micah@style.net> Cc: <nanog@merit.edu> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:17 AM Subject: Re: BIND + DLZ
And while we're on the subject...anyone know a reliable web-based admin front-end for BIND + DLZ + PostgreSQL...? Or does everybody just roll their own...?
On Wed, 2004-12-01 at 19:17, Micah McNelly wrote:
Nanog,
Does anyone have information on performance numbers comparing tinydns vs. bind w/ dlz patch?
Hit me up off-list.
/m --
Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV tel: +31.10.7507008 fax: +31.10.7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl
participants (5)
-
Alexei Roudnev -
Erik Haagsman -
Jeroen Massar -
just me -
Micah McNelly