This definately a keeper for the personal archives. :-) - paul At 01:08 PM 5/1/96 -0700, bmanning@ISI.EDU wrote:
Forwarded w/o attribution. (perhaps this is not appropriate but I do feel this way alot... :) -bill
There are really only <n> discussions on NANOG/CIDRD, which occasionally flare up like spontaneously combusting drunks on rs-talk, iepg, and ietf as well. Herein, a kind of Meta-FAQ, a Field Guide to the Meta-Wars:
I thought so too :) A classic satire. - Surekha
This definately a keeper for the personal archives. :-)
- paul
At 01:08 PM 5/1/96 -0700, bmanning@ISI.EDU wrote:
Forwarded w/o attribution. (perhaps this is not appropriate but I do feel this way alot... :) -bill
There are really only <n> discussions on NANOG/CIDRD, which occasionally flare up like spontaneously combusting drunks on rs-talk, iepg, and ietf as well. Herein, a kind of Meta-FAQ, a Field Guide to the Meta-Wars:
At 3:02 PM -0700 5/1/96, Surekha Satyam wrote:
I thought so too :) A classic satire.
satire? I think not. It was more concise, objective, and accurate than most film-at-eleven news shows, don't you think? Well, ok. maybe it wasn't. But it WOULD have been if the Internic hadn't screwed up the registration of Bill's domain name, if his provider ran its service better and, of course, if they treated the other ISPs more fairly... d/ -------------------- Dave Crocker +1 408 246 8253 Brandenburg Consulting fax: +1 408 249 6205 675 Spruce Dr. dcrocker@brandenburg.com Sunnyvale CA 94086 USA http://www.brandenburg.com Internet Mail Consortium http://www.imc.org, info@imc.org
participants (3)
-
Dave Crocker -
Paul Ferguson -
Surekha Satyam