Ref: Your note of Fri, 15 Apr 1994 20:26:47 +0200 Havard,
What this means is that I think it's fairly safe to say that there will be no connectivity problems when you pull the specific routes.
I guess we can declare the as of April 15, 1994 the Internet "guts" have been adequately CIDRized :-) Yakov.
What this means is that I think it's fairly safe to say that there will be no connectivity problems when you pull the specific routes.
I guess we can declare the as of April 15, 1994 the Internet "guts" have been adequately CIDRized :-)
Meaning there is no reason whatsoever to not advertize big blocks and remove the explicit ones. Since SURFnet withdrew all explicit routes possible and started announcing as big blocks as possible (i.e including black holes) we did not get any complaint. So: DO IT NOW! -- Willem
Meaning there is no reason whatsoever to not advertize big blocks and remove the explicit ones. Since SURFnet withdrew all explicit routes possible and started announcing as big blocks as possible (i.e including black holes) we did not get any complaint. So: DO IT NOW!
I back this up with EUnet's favourite slogan, "it works for EUnet, just do it!" EUnet has been announcing several /16 or other aggregates for sometime now and there hasn't been a single complaint, and yet we are talking about several hundreds of networks and practically the commercial internet in a few European countries. Petri
participants (3)
-
Petri Ojala -
Willem van der Scheun -
yakov＠watson.ibm.com