------------------------------------------
Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on XXXXX www.xxxxxx.com .
https://www.nanog.org/list "5.Product marketing is prohibited" It appears from a web search that you are affiliated with the company you're speaking about. scott
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Scott Weeks wrote:
------------------------------------------
Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on XXXXX www.xxxxxx.com .
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from a web search that you are affiliated with the company you're speaking about.
Mentioning a product that you happen to work on/for while in context hardly seems like it should rise to the level of prohibited marketing. Then again, perhaps we should hire consultants to figure that out for us. -- Brandon Ross Yahoo & AIM: BrandonNRoss +1-404-635-6667 ICQ: 2269442 Skype: brandonross Schedule a meeting: http://www.doodle.com/bross
Yes Scott. It was on topic and genuine in the approach, but understand the nuances around it. I did declare the interest in the second email when a more detailed explainer was included with a request to take it offline. That felt like I was stepping over the mark for the sake of pointing out the technical differences between peeringdb and XXXXXXXXXX hence the declaration and wanting to take it off line to not fill people's in-boxes. That leads back to the first point to of doing it in the first place to avoid this. Apologies. Cheers [b]
On 13 Jul 2016, at 6:23 AM, Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> wrote:
------------------------------------------
Might be worthwhile to also look at throwing your fabric/IX on XXXXX www.xxxxxx.com .
"5.Product marketing is prohibited"
It appears from a web search that you are affiliated with the company you're speaking about.
scott
participants (3)
-
Bevan Slattery -
Brandon Ross -
Scott Weeks