On 2008/02/15 11:34, ChiYoung Joung wrote:

Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: base64 ... PEhUTUw+PEhFQUQ+CjxNRVRBIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9Q29udGVudC1UeXBlIGNvbnRlbnQ9J3RleHQv aHRtbDsgY2hhcnNldD13aW5kb3dzLTEyNTInPgo8dGl0bGU+U2Ftc3VuZyBFbnRlcnByaXNlIFBv cnRhbCBteVNpbmdsZTwvdGl0bGU+CjxzdHlsZT4gUCwgdGQsIGxpIHtmb250LWZhbWlseTpBcmlh

A minor point perhaps, but most technical people I know prefer to receive plaintext emails. base64-encoded HTML, especially where it's not a multipart email with a plain ascii-encoded alternative, is more likely to be blocked by spam filters.