----- Original Message Follows ----- From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
Ideally (if I have better luck) I would like to get providers to direct outage notices to this list. All that
That's not going to happen. Providers don't want that stuff public. Makes 'em look bad... scott
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame... Rick On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Scott Weeks wrote:
----- Original Message Follows ----- From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
Ideally (if I have better luck) I would like to get providers to direct outage notices to this list. All that
That's not going to happen. Providers don't want that stuff public. Makes 'em look bad...
scott
That's another debate entirely. Last I checked, the mail I get in my inbox I consider mine and thus, I will do as I please with it. Including re-posting if I want. :> Hmm.. I say forward it along! Rick Kunkel wroteth on 9/29/2006 1:45 PM:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Rick
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Scott Weeks wrote:
----- Original Message Follows ----- From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
Ideally (if I have better luck) I would like to get providers to direct outage notices to this list. All that
That's not going to happen. Providers don't want that stuff public. Makes 'em look bad...
scott
Rick Kunkel wrote:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Somebody actually reads those??? NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, you are obligated to kill yourself and anyone else who may have read it. So there. My disclaimer is scarier than yours. Nyaah. You started this silly nonsense. Knock it off and I will too, ok? It's worthless from a legal standpoint, makes you look really clueless, and is a waste of CPU cycles. Nobody reads it anyway. You're not actually reading this, are you? I didn't think so. -- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/ WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:24:43 -0700, Jay Hennigan <jay@west.net> wrote:
Rick Kunkel wrote:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Somebody actually reads those???
While in general I agree with your point, this case may be different -- it may be governed by the contract Rick has with InterNAP. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rick Kunkel wrote:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Somebody actually reads those???
NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, or believe that you have received this communication in error, you are obligated to kill yourself and anyone else who may have read it. So there. My disclaimer is scarier than yours. Nyaah. You started this silly nonsense. Knock it off and I will too, ok? It's worthless from a legal standpoint, makes you look really clueless, and is a waste of CPU cycles. Nobody reads it anyway. You're not actually reading this, are you? I didn't think so.
-- Jay Hennigan - CCIE #7880 - Network Administration - jay@west.net NetLojix Communications, Inc. - http://www.netlojix.com/ WestNet: Connecting you to the planet. 805 884-6323 - WB6RDV
I generally don't pay too much attention... In this case, I hadn't even seen one. But, for whatever reason, after the email was composed, I suddenly thought maybe I should check. The last thing I wanted to be responsible was somehow violating a contract or something. Who knows, maybe it's in the blasted 9 billion page agreement that management types sign when we get service from people. In any case, InterNAP's was a far cry from the kind that you parody below. It really only was that one sentence.... "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary." Nevertheless, maybe I should post it anyhow. It's not like it shows them in a bad light. On the contrary, they've been the most in-touch and seemingly truthful amongst the providers we've had. --Rick
On 9/29/06, Rick Kunkel <kunkel@w-link.net> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rick Kunkel wrote:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Somebody actually reads those???
I generally don't pay too much attention... In this case, I hadn't even seen one. But, for whatever reason, after the email was composed, I suddenly thought maybe I should check. The last thing I wanted to be responsible was somehow violating a contract or something. Who knows, maybe it's in the blasted 9 billion page agreement that management types sign when we get service from people.
In any case, InterNAP's was a far cry from the kind that you parody below. It really only was that one sentence....
"The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary."
Nevertheless, maybe I should post it anyhow. It's not like it shows them in a bad light. On the contrary, they've been the most in-touch and seemingly truthful amongst the providers we've had.
--Rick
It wouldn't be the first time INAP's e-mails have been posted. But really it doesn't say anymore than what's already been said on this list thus far. Fiber cut, some routing horkage on the West Coast with gblx and maybe some other providers, people working on it, no ETR, yadda, yadda, yadda. --chip -- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, chip wrote:
On 9/29/06, Rick Kunkel <kunkel@w-link.net> wrote:
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006, Jay Hennigan wrote:
Rick Kunkel wrote:
I thought about cutting and pasting verbatim the notification I got from InterNAP, but then noticed the "The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary" blurb at the end, and thought better of it, even though they weren't to blame...
Somebody actually reads those???
I generally don't pay too much attention... In this case, I hadn't even seen one. But, for whatever reason, after the email was composed, I suddenly thought maybe I should check. The last thing I wanted to be responsible was somehow violating a contract or something. Who knows, maybe it's in the blasted 9 billion page agreement that management types sign when we get service from people.
In any case, InterNAP's was a far cry from the kind that you parody below. It really only was that one sentence....
"The contents of this email message are confidential and proprietary."
Nevertheless, maybe I should post it anyhow. It's not like it shows them in a bad light. On the contrary, they've been the most in-touch and seemingly truthful amongst the providers we've had.
--Rick
It wouldn't be the first time INAP's e-mails have been posted. But really it doesn't say anymore than what's already been said on this list thus far. Fiber cut, some routing horkage on the West Coast with gblx and maybe some other providers, people working on it, no ETR, yadda, yadda, yadda.
--chip
-- Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, batteries not included, etc....
Actually, an InterNAP Support Engineer on this list just said it was fine to quote the notification since it was a widescale issue. But, as Chip says, it's kind of old news at this point. If people want to see it though, I can post. (Actually, there were two.) Thanks, Rick sigless
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Scott Weeks wrote:
----- Original Message Follows ----- From: virendra rode // <virendra.rode@gmail.com>
Ideally (if I have better luck) I would like to get providers to direct outage notices to this list. All that
That's not going to happen. Providers don't want that stuff public. Makes 'em look bad...
scott
I'm sure they love FCC for that :-) ...you may I'm a dreamer but I'm not the only one :-) regards, /virendra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFHaOhpbZvCIJx1bcRAunPAJ9b+ZGZ9lP7YE3oXzxhGEN1dGavlACeNL6w +6Q44JIDv6NmRN04A0MTphA= =zSml -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (7)
-
chip -
Jay Hennigan -
Rick Kunkel -
S. Ryan -
Scott Weeks -
Steven M. Bellovin -
virendra rode //