Re: new.net: yet another dns namespace overlay play
Another stated rationale is that ICANN UDRP is "flawed". I'm not sure how adding pirate domains improves the UDRP. The pirate has publically stated that it will follow the UDRP.
Several folks suggested examples of "reverse-hijacked" domain decisions. I've taken a bit of time to look at the most frequently cited. Here's two that are exemplar:
[ ... ] We've probably strayed way off-topic, but I think that it speaks volumes about how well the UDRP works that research had to be done to find two cases where it made a reasonable ruling. -------ScottG.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Obviously you missed the point, or don't understand what exemplar means.... I've looked at dozens. These two were forwarded to me most often as "the most glaring." If the "most glaring" are reasonable rulings (one UDRP, one ACPA), then I suspect the rest are too. You can take a look yourself, and draw your own conclusions. The UDRP decisions are on-line. Scott Gifford wrote:
Several folks suggested examples of "reverse-hijacked" domain decisions. I've taken a bit of time to look at the most frequently cited. Here's two that are exemplar:
[ ... ]
We've probably strayed way off-topic, but I think that it speaks volumes about how well the UDRP works that research had to be done to find two cases where it made a reasonable ruling.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQCVAwUBOqhZMdm/qMj6R+sxAQFF0AQAtdaFMKBxVdd0NL9WPnf2+Al8jRcGLLzP Gii6T5y6l1w+S46mB4cAmYrFx/GHcmCMPTvwj8Sw+bAaOmvXqUjdVtDZanRbu60c FCe1MLCD3pZDGvm23LMMUXz8GtaZDfYSQTK0gO1xlu84p5QFwiO8tbbQV5ZH467b 64ZmRMKPerQ= =Fkde -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
Scott Gifford -
William Allen Simpson