Re: Issue with 208.192.0.0/8 - 208.196.93.0/24?
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 19:14:07 -0800, chuck goolsbee wrote:
Forgive the intrusion... Forgiven We have a customer who uses some merchant services off of 208.196.93.204, which seems to be unreachable via any location I try. Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the phone @ UU wouldn't open a ticket because I'm not a customer (but his traces were dying in the same place as mine:
207.ATM6-0.GW11.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.29.185))
Can anybody out there hit that IP (208.196.93.204) at the moment? Or indeed much of anything in that /8
[C:\]ping 208.196.93.204 PING 208.196.93.204: 56 data bytes ----208.196.93.204 PING Statistics---- 7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss [C:\]tracerte 208.196.93.204 0 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0 ms 0 ms 8 ms 2 10.20.12.9 (10.20.12.9) 55 ms 55 ms 55 ms 3 ppp-203.144.161.5.revip.asianet.co.th (203.144.161.5) 39 ms 5 4 ppp-203.144.144.157.revip.asianet.co.th (203.144.144.157) 54 m ms 5 ppp-203.144.144.2.revip.asianet.co.th (203.144.144.2) 242 ms s 6 211.180.13.225 (211.180.13.225) 133 ms 133 ms 125 ms 7 210.120.192.136 (210.120.192.136) 133 ms 133 ms 132 ms 8 203.255.234.198 (203.255.234.198) 258 ms 203.255.234.210 (203. 266 ms 203.255.234.198 (203.255.234.198) 266 ms 9 203.255.234.36 (203.255.234.36) 250 ms 258 ms 258 ms 10 67.104.60.49 (67.104.60.49) 258 ms 258 ms 281 ms 11 p4-3-0.MAR2.Fremont-CA.us.xo.net (207.88.80.13) 258 ms 258 12 p4-0-0.RAR2.SanJose-CA.us.xo.net (65.106.5.137) 273 ms 266 13 p0-0-0-1.RAR1.SanJose-CA.us.xo.net (65.106.1.65) 266 ms 281 14 p0-0.IR1.PaloAlto-CA.us.xo.net (65.106.5.194) 273 ms 336 ms 15 206.111.12.150 (206.111.12.150) 265 ms 266 ms 258 ms 16 157.at-5-1-0.XR1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.51.58) 1031 ms 273 17 0.so-0-1-0.XL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.241) 266 ms * 281 18 0.so-3-0-0.TL1.SAC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.53.250) 273 ms 274 ms 19 0.so-1-2-0.TL1.NYC9.ALTER.NET (152.63.10.77) 352 ms 335 ms 20 0.so-3-0-0.XL1.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.27.29) 321 ms 321 ms 21 0.so-0-0-0.XR1.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.19.85) 336 ms 336 ms 22 207.ATM6-0.GW11.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.29.185) 360 ms 352 m 23 * * * 24 * [dies] [C:\]host 208.196.93.204 208.196.93.204 = ecobeauty.org Jeffrey Race
Emails to UUnet's NOC are unaswered and the guy I talked to on the phone @ UU wouldn't open a ticket because I'm not a customer (but his traces were dying in the same place as mine:
207.ATM6-0.GW11.NYC1.ALTER.NET (152.63.29.185))
Can anybody out there hit that IP (208.196.93.204) at the moment? Or indeed much of anything in that /8
[C:\]ping 208.196.93.204 PING 208.196.93.204: 56 data bytes
----208.196.93.204 PING Statistics---- 7 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
[C:\]tracerte 208.196.93.204 0 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
[skip]
24 * [dies]
[C:\]host 208.196.93.204 208.196.93.204 = ecobeauty.org
And we are supposed to take "The Ultimate Diagnosis" from a person who would not think of using tcptrace, telnetting into port 80 or to see if that was an ACL? Phlease. Alex
DJR> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:01:51 +0700 DJR> From: Dr. Jeffrey Race DJR> [C:\]ping 208.196.93.204 DJR> [C:\]host 208.196.93.204 1. You read the NANOG FAQ, yes? Please explain your post. 2. Did TCP attempts to various well-known ports stay in SYN_SENT, switch to CONNECTED, or return a RST? Or did you not try? Thanks for proving that experience in one sphere doesn't bring any free credibility in another. You posted what you should not, and gave the wrong answer at that. If you want to go around bragging "i'm mad l33t, yo" without skills to back it up, I suggest IRC as a better medium. Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are obvious. Consider being an early adopter of IPv8. Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
Altho sometime I have to wonder especially with some of the recent posts. Perhaps clueful folk should sneak off and form nanog-clueful mailing list ;) Steve
obvious.
Consider being an early adopter of IPv8.
Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist@brics.com> To: blacklist@brics.com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist@brics.com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:50:01PM +0000, steve@telecomplete.co.uk said:
Remember: The majority of the posters here probably have roughly as much (but not as much) of an ego as you, yet a _lot_ more experience and skills to back it up. I think the results are
Altho sometime I have to wonder especially with some of the recent posts. Perhaps clueful folk should sneak off and form nanog-clueful mailing list ;)
Please don't; there are many of us lurking who are learning a great deal from listening in on the conversations of the clueful. -- Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net illum oportet crescere me autem minui
participants (6)
-
alex＠yuriev.com -
Dr. Jeffrey Race -
E.B. Dreger -
Peter Galbavy -
Scott Francis -
Stephen J. Wilcox