Jeremy, Not to put too fine a point on it, but the nanog archives weren't really a solution for me because I needed quotes from people on the ATM issue, quotes that I could use in my story. Would you have preferred if I had cribbed someone's old nanog post without their permission, which is what I would have needed to do given the reality of news deadlines? I don't think so. I also was seeking reaction to Mr. Feldman's comment, which the archives would obviously not offer. Unlike many of my colleagues in the computer trade press, I am rabid about sourcing and accuracy. Thankfully, a number of people on the nanog list were very helpful in this regard. Best, James Glave Wired News http://www.wirednews.com At 02:52 PM 2/11/98 -0600, you wrote:

Not to put too fine a point on it, but this has been discussed in endless detail on the Nanog archive. I remember a day when reporters did research but, I guess we are seeing the least common denominator once again.

In message <3.0.32.19980210131256.009db2b4@get.wired.com>, James Glave

writes:

...

Hi all,

I lurked on this morning's state of the net presentation, and I'd like to do a short piece on it for Wired News (http://www.wired.com). The MAE "fragility" and transition to ATM seems a contentious issue with many in the audience. Is there someone on the list who would like to offer their perspective on this, especially Mr. Feldman's observation in the Q&A that "the gigaswitch has reached the end of its useful life."

What, briefly, is the controversy around moving to ATM for high-bandwidth data needs? If you reply, please do so with the assumption that I may quote you for publication. Thanks for your time,

jtg

--- Jeremy Porter, Freeside Communications, Inc. jerry@fc.net PO BOX 80315 Austin, Tx 78708 | 1-800-968-8750 | 512-458-9810 http://www.fc.net

James Glave : Senior Technology Writer : Wired News http://www.wirednews.com : 415.276.8430