Is anyone else getting this junk regarding the list? And can we put a stop
to it?
Granted in a perfect world everyone runs software throughout the entire
enterprise that is on the bleeding edge of the latest proposed standards,
but some of us only have so big of a budget.
---
Michael Damm, MIS Department, Irwin Research & Development
V: 509.457.5080 x298 F: 509.577.0301 E: miked@irwinresearch.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Miyoko Shioda [mailto:wjxv4y@k3.dion.ne.jp]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:30 AM
To: Mike Damm
Subject: Re: About your using mailer
dear Mike Damm,
Sorry, I am talking about NANOG mailing list.
Please please change your MUA in mainling list...
Regards,
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 09:28:17 -0800
Mike Damm <MikeD@irwinresearch.com> wrote:
What mailing list are you talking about?
---
Michael Damm, MIS Department, Irwin Research & Development
V: 509.457.5080 x298 F: 509.577.0301 E: miked@irwinresearch.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Miyoko Shioda [mailto:wjxv4y@k3.dion.ne.jp]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 5:16 PM
To: MikeD@irwinresearch.com
Subject: About your using mailer
Hi,
I read your messages in mailing list.
Your using mailer(MUA) does not seems to support In-Reply-To nor
References
field. These field is defined in RFC-2822.
If these field does not be outputted when you reply, tree construction
will be break every time you post the messages to mailing list.
It is inconvenient for the others.
Please please change your mailer for the public good,
at least when you post to mailing list.
Today almost mailers support these field(at least In-Reply-To)
except for the following mailers.
MSN hotmail
Exchange Server <= 2000 (Exchange Server 2003 will support In-Reply-To.)
Lotus Notes < 6.0
MIME-Tools
AOL mailer
dtmail
Novell GroupWise
foxmail
regards,
--
Miyoko Shioda
wjxv4y@k3.dion.ne.jp
--
Miyoko Shioda <wjxv4y@k3.dion.ne.jp>