RE: Anyone alive at ep.net
Bill, -I emailed both email addresses listed on the ep.net website contact information. -I have not as of this email received a response to my request or that email from you -Jeff's email bounces since it's an @ep.net and that seems to be rejecting all mail from both tdstelecom.com and fdfnet.net -I see no fax/phone contact information listed on the ep.net website. If you provide them, I will use them. -The webpage the IX gave me to register for IP space contained no phone/fax contact information. -I attempted to contact your INOC-DBA line, it was not active. So yes, really. Could you please provide me with what we are missing to receive allocation. Thanks, -Chris -----Original Message----- From: bill [mailto:bmanning@karoshi.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:25 PM To: Christopher.Malayter@tdstelecom.com Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Anyone alive at ep.net
I've been awaiting allocation of an IP from an IX that is allocated by ep.net.
I've been recieving connection refused form the mailserver from several domains for over a week.
really? have you tried any other contact methods to get feedback from ep.net? telephone? fax? non-broadcast email?
If anyone from ep.net could email me with our allocation request, thanks are in order.
not enough information presented to act on your request.
Thanks ahead of time,
-Chris
--bill
Bill,
-I emailed both email addresses listed on the ep.net website contact information. -I have not as of this email received a response to my request or that email from you -Jeff's email bounces since it's an @ep.net and that seems to be rejecting all mail from both tdstelecom.com and fdfnet.net
will get that checked out. other requests are being received and processed so there is an problem somewhere.
-I see no fax/phone contact information listed on the ep.net website. If you provide them, I will use them.
true. I had thought they were there. whois will tell you. for your reference: +1.310.322.8102 voice +1.310.322.8889 fax
-The webpage the IX gave me to register for IP space contained no phone/fax contact information.
that will be corrected.
-I attempted to contact your INOC-DBA line, it was not active.
office moves / not hooked back up yet.
So yes, really. Could you please provide me with what we are missing to receive allocation.
we have no data on which to act.
Thanks,
-Chris
-----Original Message----- From: bill [mailto:bmanning@karoshi.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:25 PM To: Christopher.Malayter@tdstelecom.com Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Anyone alive at ep.net
I've been awaiting allocation of an IP from an IX that is allocated by ep.net.
I've been recieving connection refused form the mailserver from several domains for over a week.
really? have you tried any other contact methods to get feedback from ep.net? telephone? fax? non-broadcast email?
If anyone from ep.net could email me with our allocation request, thanks are in order.
not enough information presented to act on your request.
Thanks ahead of time,
-Chris
--bill
-----Original Message----- From: bill [mailto:bmanning@karoshi.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:25 PM To: Christopher.Malayter@tdstelecom.com Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Anyone alive at ep.net
I've been awaiting allocation of an IP from an IX that is allocated by ep.net.
I've been recieving connection refused form the mailserver from several domains for over a week.
--bill
Ok for the NANOG folks. We found Christopher's request in the "questionable" spool, it was submitted less than 48 hours ago. The EP.NET turn time is listed at 96 hours. The gyrations on the EP.NET end are due to: - office relo - software upgrades (new OS) - spam mitigation processes His request will be processed in the normal window. There are still some issues w/ procmail/spamassasin tuning. --bill
I think we can all agree, that we all still love you :)
Ok for the NANOG folks. We found Christopher's request in the "questionable" spool, it was submitted less than 48 hours ago. The EP.NET turn time is listed at 96 hours.
The gyrations on the EP.NET end are due to: - office relo - software upgrades (new OS) - spam mitigation processes
His request will be processed in the normal window. There are still some issues w/ procmail/spamassasin tuning.
--bill
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
bill wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: bill [mailto:bmanning@karoshi.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:25 PM To: Christopher.Malayter@tdstelecom.com Cc: nanog@merit.edu Subject: Re: Anyone alive at ep.net
I've been awaiting allocation of an IP from an IX that is allocated by ep.net.
I've been recieving connection refused form the mailserver from several domains for over a week.
--bill
Ok for the NANOG folks. We found Christopher's request in the "questionable" spool, it was submitted less than 48 hours ago. The EP.NET turn time is listed at 96 hours.
The gyrations on the EP.NET end are due to: - office relo - software upgrades (new OS) - spam mitigation processes
His request will be processed in the normal window. There are still some issues w/ procmail/spamassasin tuning.
Interesting to compare this with the Wed Jan 07 13:27:16 2004 response.
hey folk, lighten up. bill does this on his own time and for a pittance. if an exchange point wants professional level service, well they can get their address space from an rir and run the allocation service themselves. my guess is that bill will soon look inexpensive and responsive. a private whine to him usually gets a response. after all, being a whiner himself, turnabout is fair play. :-) as to the question of whether bill is alive, as he is a deadhead, i guess that's up for grabs. :-) randy
my guess is that bill will soon look inexpensive and responsive.
cheap but not free. :)
a private whine to him usually gets a response. after all, being a whiner himself, turnabout is fair play. :-)
amen.
as to the question of whether bill is alive, as he is a deadhead, i guess that's up for grabs. :-)
"closing of winterland" - passing time on the WDC/LAX run.
randy
--bill
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:30:52PM -0600, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
Interesting to compare this with the Wed Jan 07 13:27:16 2004 response.
FWIW: The last 2 two requests I put into Bill were done in < 24 hours. The most recent was about a week ago. -- Steve Rubin / AE6CH / Phone: (408)406-1308 Email: ser@tch.org / N57DL / http://www.tch.org/~ser/
Interesting to compare this with the Wed Jan 07 13:27:16 2004 response.
FWIW: The last 2 two requests I put into Bill were done in < 24 hours. The most recent was about a week ago.
Steve Rubin
Ok... do folks really want this automated? I've always been a fan of humans doing the validation checks... cuts down on hijacking :) But if y'all are so impatient that you -must- have it -RIGHT NOW-, then I guess a little (more) programing might be worth it. Feedback to me and not the list please. --bill
participants (6)
-
Alex Rubenstein -
bill -
Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. -
Malayter, Christopher -
Randy Bush -
Steve Rubin